Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

The Long, Dark Tea-Time Of My Soul

August 22nd 2008 09:10
My kettle is just about to boil.

That's not a euphemism, despite the fact -- and this is a complete coincidence -- my "kettle" really is about to "boil". Such is life.

No, the actual kettle is on the actual stove, heating away on top of the gas flame, and I'm left pondering my identity as an Australian. Oh, these two things are most definitely linked. How? Well, it all comes down to Colonial Imperialism vs Cultural Imperialism.

My struggle as an Australian is markedly different from, say, the struggle of a drought-stricken farmer trying to irrigate their land with dust, or of someone living on the streets of Melbourne trying to figure out why people in much nicer clothes keep thanking his grandparents every time they open an art exhibition. My personal struggle is a very middle-class, WASPish one, and I preface it with an apology to anyone who has to struggle with, you know, actual stuff in life.


It's a struggle of duality. I've come to terms with the fact that one half of my family is Jewish and the other half is Christian; Hanukkah and Christmas usually meant lots more presents than my friends got, and so coming to terms with that as a child was like coming to terms with getting two desserts. I've come to terms with the fact that I live in the only country that's also a continent; our idea of a border is somewhere you put a towel down and lie on for a bit, not something you have to defend from the Mongolians. No, the problem is that, from a cultural standpoint, we are heavily influenced by both the English and the Americans.

The film, television, music and literature we get is almost exclusively a mix of US and UK, and though the scales tip more frequently towards that of the US, this is balanced out by the fact that we were colonised by the Brits. Case in point: the characters on Neighbours may be sounding more and more Yankified by the day, but they're still on a show called Neighbours, not Neighbors. Note the appearance of "u" in the program, particularly if you're a Melbourne-based actor who's been alive at some point in the past three decades.


It's not that we don't have a culture of our own, it's just that we're not entirely sure what it is. Once you've sifted through the things that were clearly brought over on the First Fleet (or any subsequent voyage), and guiltily dismissed anything distinctly Aboriginal (there's not a pale, city-dwelling person that feels comfortable claiming a witchety-grub snack as part of their own culture, though this is more to do with potential accusations of cultural thievery than dietary squeamishness), there's not a lot left.

There's the meat pie, but none of us should be too eagre to claim a food with unidentifiable contents. (In 2002, the Australian Consumers Association discovered that three supermarket meat pie brands did not meet the minimum 25% meat content. First, the minimum is only 25%?!? Second, you guys couldn't even live up to that?!? What, there's a supply shortage of pig snouts and RSPCA "recyclables"?) There's the song "Down Under" (where, reliable sources inform me, women glow and men plunder), but even that was largely written by a Scotsman (Colin Hay, born Scotland, 1953). And we can call Nicole Kidman "Our Nic" as much as we want, but that won't change the fact that she was born in Hawaii. (Side note: though I consider the finest Australian mind to be that of Shaun Micallef's, I loathe to mention him as an example of Australiana, because most of us simply don't get him. He is a product of British comedy more than anything, and would clearly be ten times more successful were he in the UK, a fact I selfishly hope is never made clear to him.)

As a consumer of art, this isn't really a huge problem for me. I can still jump from Monty Python to M*A*S*H without problem. I can watch Star Trek and Doctor Who without experiencing cultural whiplash. I'll buy the new Chuck Palaniuk book with the exact same fervour with which I buy the new Nick Hornby book. It's really not a huge problem.

Even though I'm able to balance so many disparate elements, I do still feel an undeniable pressure to commit to one over the other, as if I'm standing in the middle of a battle ground during the US War of Independence, with both sides beckoning at me and going: "Eh...? Eh...?"

There's no real way to settle this conflict (other than wait around for another few decades and then argue about it some more), mostly due to the fact that there are too many contributing factors. Far too many to consolidate into one single, spuriously-researched study, anyway. I have therefore decided to bring the entire debate down to one singular thing: I am going to drink a cup of tea.

You see, though I've thought a lot about the two familial cultures that pull me one way and the other, I've always thought they were pretty evenly-matched. There is, however, one area in which there is a clear victor.

Anyone who knows me know that I love my coffee. I love other people's coffee as well, but they tend to get upset when I drink it, so I usually keep to my own. I could delve deep into the nuances of this love, but that's probably worthy of its own entry, and this piece is already far too long. Needless to say, I am a big lover of coffee.

Despite its Ethiopian origins, its Persian discovery, its Italian development, it is, in many ways, an American drink. At least, for the purposes of this argument it is. I suppose I should explain this logic leap briefly: one, I am not talking about the warm, goats milk-infused fecal matter that the large chains serve in hastily-deteriorating Styrofoam cups; two, if your pro-European or pro-African sensibilities require further clarification, I shall hereby refer to it as cawfee, as the northeast American dialect would have it.

I love my cawfee. I love drinking it as I write. I love sitting in cawfee shops as I read the newspaper. Cawfee is the training wheels to my life, except I have no desire to ever take them off.

The English love their tea. Call it a stereotype all you want, but it's incredibly commonplace. When I hear some of the country's more proficient orators talk about their love of tea, they do so with passion that I would use to describe my own, different drink of choice. The thing that nags at my soul is this: I don't like tea.

Well, I really like herbal teas, green tea and chai, but I wouldn't describe those as being "proper" tea. No, when these guys talk about tea, they're talking about traditional black tea, and black tea is the most commonly-drunk one, and it's the one I don't like. Or, at least, I didn't like it years ago when I tried it, and that was a powerful first impression.

So, right here and now, I am going to make one last ditch attempt at giving my English side a leg up. I am going to have a cup of tea.

I've been doing my research, and have decided upon the matter of my imbibement. I have been reliably informed that it's acceptable to use a tea bag if nothing else is available, and that this is definitely not the equivalent of drinking instant coffee. (Drinking instant coffee is just like drinking real coffee, in the same way that rubbing your groin against the side of a chair is just like having sex with Marilyn Monroe.) I have therefore chosen a nice-looking tea bag of Earl Grey with which to make my drink. (Note: I did try staring at my sink and telling it "Tea, Earl Grey, hot", but nothing happened...) I will be adding milk, but not lemon or sugar or honey, for fear of overpowering the taste too much and rendering the whole experience pointless. (Some people tell you not to add milk under any circumstances, but Douglas Adams says it's okay, and he's never steered me wrong before.) The water will be boiling at the exact moment I add it to the tea, and the milk will be added to the cup first so as to prevent scalding. As the water is now boiling, I shall go and perform said task and return here with the cup.

Okay, I'm back. I left the tea bag in for a long time, because I like my coffee strong and I like my herbal tea strong, so I assume I just like strong drinks. Here goes...

That first sip was strange. Strange in the sense that the taste is exactly as I remembered it, only now I appear to like it. This isn't the first time this has happened. Even though I don't like bananas, I can remember a time when I did, and I can remember quite specifically enjoying the taste of them. Regardless of that, if I had a banana now, I can tell you I really wouldn't enjoy it. I'm not sure why this is, but some expert in the human brain or the genus Musa can sort it out for us.

As I make my way through this cup, I'm beginning to understand what people see in it. I'm also getting a good sense of why this is such an English drink. Coffee gives you a real buzz, makes you excitable, and really does suit Americans. Tea, conversely, is quite a calming drink. Drinking it, I really do feel like reading Dickens or watching Dave Allen or colonising the West Indies. Drinking coffee makes me want to read Mark Twain or watch Johnny Carson or invade various countries in the Middle East. Not a huge difference, but the devil's in the details.

Obviously, it's too early to judge whether I'm a fully qualified tea drinker or not, but I can sense a conversion process has definitely begun. It will take some before, when choosing between a brewed leaf and a crushed bean, the Anglophile within me will finally take total control.
40
Vote
Shared on
   


I find that nothing lifts the mood more than the impossible becoming possible. That is, the sudden discovery that something extraordinary and brilliantly impossible has just taken place. No doubt, you're surely thinking, this sudden revelation of a deeper truth has been evoked by a specific example, and one that I'm about to give. You are, as always, completely correct.

The Phoenix Islands sit comfortably in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. They were part of the British Empire's final attempt at colonial expansion. They sit in the middle of 410 500 square kilometres of protected marine waters, the largest in the world. A 2005 census puts its human population at forty-one.

Oh yes, and it has traveled in time.

No, it actually has.

If you somehow got hold of a time machine, and was able to resist the temptation to (a) go back to 1970 and copyright the words and lyrics of "Imagine", (b) invest in Apple shares, or (c) become your own uncle, simply because that takes so much more planning, you might want to consider setting the controls for: Phoenix Island, December 31, 1994. The time machine would most likely break, take you to completely the wrong place, or suddenly cause Deutscher to beat Keith in the presidential election.

Whatever it would do, it would have an impossible time location Phoenix Islands at that time and place.

It's the same for the Line Islands. Program in "Line Islands, December 31, 1994", and suddenly smoke is rising from the time rotor, and IT support is telling you to turn the thing off and on again.

Why you'd want to visit the Line Islands instead of the Phoenix Islands, incidentally, is a little beyond me. Sure, the Line Islands appear to be more habitable, what with the extra nine thousand people living on it, but there's something a little less grand about it. Okay, it's resplendent with reefs and lagoons, and if my choice was just between going and not going I'd pick going, but in this hypothetical my time machine can take me to the Phoenix Islands, so that's my port of call.

I mean, you can go to Birnie Island (part of the Phoenix clan), and see the entire island around you. It's fifty-seven hectares, half a kilometre wide, and grassy. Fair enough, there's no drinkable water there, but you can pretty much stand in the middle and look at every single coast! Who'd need water? You'd have ocean sunrises and sunsets every single day, and crystal clear moon rise/sets every night.

Even better, you can go to Orona island, which is more like a bagel than an island, being as it's a narrow strip of land surrounding a massive lagoon. There are cocoanut trees, so you could probably live off cocoanut daiquiris. There's also evidence of prehistoric Polynesian habitation, as an ancient stone marae sits on the eastern tip of the island.

Or you could go to the beautiful Nikumaroro island and search for Amelia Earhart's plane (it was commonly considered the place she might have crash-landed, though no expedition has uncovered any evidence of the wreck).

Phoenix Islands is definitely the place I'd go to, though I'm not sure I can be bothered learning Gilbertese, its native language spoken by only 105 000 people. On the other hand, I'm probably being a bit too harsh on the Line Islands. It's not like it doesn't have anything extraordinary to offer. It is, after all, the place in the world that is furthest ahead in time.

In fact, that's how the time traveling took place. In 1994, the Line Islands switched from UTC-10 to UTC 14, and the Phoenix Islands switched from UTC-11 to UTC 13. The Line Islands became the earliest time zone in the world, but in the process, both islands missed out December 31, 1994.

Missing this date meant they had (and, presumably, still have) no idea that performance artist Leigh Bowery and actor/sports star Woody Strode both died. They'd also miss the huge time travel trade of tourists for that day in time, which might not seem like a lot of money, but it's an average net loss of fifty thousand quatloos. It does, however, mean that everyone on these islands looks a day younger, and will for eternity.

If none of this amazes you, if the fact that a whole collection of islands leaped forward in time back in the 90s does nothing for your imagination, then I simply leave you with an old Gilbertese saying: "I wish we spoke English. Who the fuck speaks Gilbertese?"
44
Vote
Shared on
   


It's Always Bellwether

July 23rd 2008 02:56
Things are irrefutable up to the point that they're no longer true.

Not the most profound statement in the world, but one that will remain correct until it's not. I'm quite confident in it, though I'm not planning to have it engraved on my tombstone, mostly because I have no reason to suspect that I will die. It's all about playing with statistics.

The reason I will not die is simple: there are, at time of writing, more people alive than have ever lived in history. If you therefore conducted a survey of everyone that has ever lived and everyone that is currently living, you would find that most people have not died. As one of the living, a survey of my entire life would show that I have consistently not died at any point. If I was good at drawing graphs, I could easily make one that would incorporate this evidence and prove that I am immortal.

Statistics aren't just about fooling people into thinking things, though that is their primary function. They're also essential for making predictions about the world, so we can live our lives accordingly.

I'll give you a good example, though it's one that's a lot less grand than my immortal one. I hadn't caught the train in years, a fact that ceased being true when my car died a horrible and expensive death. I had to travel from Frankston to the city, and found myself on the same train as my friend Georgina. When the train broke down at Moorabbin Station, we decided to go and get a coffee and wait it out a bit.

This would not have been notable if not for the fact that about a week later, I caught the train from Frankston to the city, and again -- completely by accident -- took the trip with Georgina. We exchanged a look of mild shock when the train was, once again, unexpectedly delayed at Moorabbin Station. Most people would put this down to coincidence, but if I had to draw any evidence from this at all, it's that every time I catch the train, I will do so with Georgina and we will break down at Moorabbin.

Invariably, the moment you begin to notice these patterns, they stop being true. It's elections that have made this fact apparent to me. In the lead up to an election, the press will invariably try to announce the outcome as early as possible. The only way they can do this is with their precious bellwethers.

For those unfamiliar with the term, a bellwether (or bellewether) refers to the age-old technique of placing a bell around a castrated ram so that it may lead its flock of sheep. The adapted term, layered with more irony that I suspect was first intended, now tends to refer to elements that influence or presage a future event. For instance, the Australian Federal seat of Eden-Monaro has (at time of writing) predicted every election since 1972. That is, the party that Eden-Monaro votes for is the one that tends to win the election. Most countries have them, and they're always the source of much press focus.

The problem is that whenever the press announces a bellwether we haven't heard of, that's the year they get it wrong. I remember a story back in 2004 about a bar in France where expatriate American citizens would have a small vote on who would win the election. They'd apparently been correct in every single election for decades upon decades, yet it was on the year that a US network decided to cover them that they picked John Kerry as the winner. Spoiler alert: he wasn't.

Things are irrefutable up to the point that they're no longer true. Remember that the next time you're listening to the press announce an entire election based on the voting habits of 0.02% of the population. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a train to catch, so I'll probably tell Georgina about all this.
46
Vote
Shared on
   


The Evil That Men Don't

July 16th 2008 01:00
I can't remember the exact details, but there was a court case in England when I was a teenager, where two kids stood accused of killing a four year old boy they'd lured away from a shopping centre. In sentencing them -- and this is the bit that stood out in my memory -- the judge called them both "evil".

I was bothered by this, but I wasn't sure why. Obviously, I had no particular attachment to either of the killers, and was naturally disgusted by what they'd done. So why did the judge's... well, judgment bother me so much? I wasn't really sure at the time, but it became clear to me years later


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
Shared on
   


A lot of people are walking around right now with the misconception that I don't know their name.

I really like that description of them, because they sound as if they're wandering about in a daze, preoccupied with the fact that I might possibly have given them a "Hey, you!" instead of a "Hey, Reginald". (I don't actually have any friends named Reginald. Or maybe I do, and I've forgotten. He's probably simultaneously pleased at getting a mention and upset that I'm doubting his existence


[ Click here to read more ]
64
Vote
Shared on
   


If you had to be anyone else, any figure in history, anyone at all... who would it be?

As hypotheticals go, this one is a lot more common that others we can speculate about (see: Dinner For Three). What sets this one apart is that it's a hypothetical that people actually get asked: Which person has the life that you most want? If you could step into someone's shoes, whose feet would you be and why


[ Click here to read more ]
73
Vote
Shared on
   


People who see both sides of the argument are frequently ignored. In a battle of black vs white, grey gets no air time because grey is not interesting, except for when it signifies a Middle Earth wizard who has come to steal your jewelry. If you're someone who frequently sees the merits of opposing ideas, then stay out of the way of those who have passion, for they will shout louder than you and will knock you over in the process.

There is another category, mind you. Someone who is not passionately arguing one point of view, nor is diplomatically balancing the two. That is the person who sees no merit in either side, and will happily explain, in long and deceptively insulting words, why everybody else is stupid. This person will be noticed, for their argument is so unexpected, so free of ulterior motive, that everybody else will be caught off guard. They're not trying to force their point of view, nor are they trying to placate or diffuse. Everybody will stop and pay attention to this person, struck by the sudden fear of being out-cyniced


[ Click here to read more ]
55
Vote
Shared on
   


Inanimate News Day

June 10th 2008 09:19
"The bombers," the news reporter told me, "stopped for petrol. Their eery images on this CCTV footage show them behaving (pause for dramatic effect) as if nothing is wrong."

I like to imagine a time when journalism was held to a higher standard. I don't know if such a time existed, but I like to look back at it wistfully. The good old days, I've noticed, are usually exactly the same as our current days, only without the benefit of nostalgia-propelled distance. It is therefore essential, even after such a realisation has been reached, to treat the distorted, rose-coloured memories as if they are fact


[ Click here to read more ]
65
Vote
Shared on
   


The Oddities of Sign Language

June 2nd 2008 05:15
Taking an extended road trip is good for the soul, though not the environment. Or bank account. Or resale value of the car once your speedometer tops two hundred thousand kilometres. However, it's good for clearing the head, even though the trip can start to get a bit tedious after the first few hours.

Listening to music, the radio and spoken word CDs (Salmon of Doubt and I Am America are the best things ever) is a good way to pass the time, but if you're taking a trip along a road you've been on many times before, you might get sick of looking at the same scenery over and over again. The temptation is to read something, but I have discovered this can sometimes interfere with the driving. The only thing left to read is road signs, but the majority of those simply indicate what speed you should be going and how far away from townships you are. The speed signs have no narrative continuity, and although there's some ramping tension to be gained from the approaching town distances, after you experience the same general progression with every town, it gets a bit tedious. Kind-of like the Friday the 13th sequels


[ Click here to read more ]
64
Vote
Shared on
   


I Want The Leaves To Blow

May 23rd 2008 10:51
Is there any greater invention than the leaf blower? Honestly, it's my favourite of all the inventions. No other human-made device has, in my opinion, summed up our society with such spot-on precision than this brilliant device.

Really, the leaf blower has only one basic function: it remove leaves from one area and puts them in another


[ Click here to read more ]
75
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
4 Posts
23 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Lee Zachariah's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Lee Zachariah
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]