File Under Moron
March 16th 2008 12:04
I'm a big fan of ordering my possessions. Some people have suggested I have OCD, but I find that claim to be spurious spurious spurious spurious (sorry, I felt compelled to say the last word of that sentence four times... I'm not sure why).
My DVDs are, naturally, in alphabetical order. My books are arranged alphabetically by author surname, then within that, chronological by book. Similarly, CDs are alphabetical by band/artist, and within that, the albums are chronological. Importantly, solo artists are alphabetical by surname, whilst bands are alphabetical by the first word. This is an important rules, because Paul Simon solo albums go under "S", but Jethro Tull albums go under "J", because it's the name of the band and therefore a singular entity with no such thing as a surname. Really, it's just common sense.
My friends have similar systems. Some of them alphabetise by director. Being a film geek, I really like this system, but there are problems. It does mean splitting up certain series. Harry Potter would be five different places. The Star Trek films would be all over the place, which, I must admit, is somewhat fitting given the Star Trek films are all over the place. As much as I appreciate it, I must admit I think it an imperfect system. And yes, my friends and I have discussed this at length.
I'm sure some of you are laughing scornfully now (also known as lolscorn), because you believe all of this is useless and has no practical value. You would be wrong.
Many years back, I began working at a video store -- Reel Time Video, to be precise, now defunct -- and with few customers, I had very little to do on my first night. It was also quite apparent to me that nobody else in the store really knew anything about movies. There was a lovely (and sassy) elderly lady who used to own the store, the Chinese woman with little-to-no English who had bought it from her, and the manager, a middle-aged woman who wasn't a huge film buff but still had enough basic knowledge to get by. Most of the sections were in a complete mess, so, on my first night, I stood in front of the science fiction section (comprised mostly of Star Trek videos) and placed them in alphabetical order, and the many Star Trek videos in chronological order. When I was done, that thoroughly unattractive mess had transformed into a pretty decent-looking collection of SF film and television. That night, the usually-ignored SF shelf had at least three people in front of it at any given time, and twelve Star Trek videos were hired out (before then, none had been hired in weeks). Over the next few shifts, I did the same to the other sections, with similar successes. Don't tell me an anal-retentive adherence to shelf order doesn't have any value! (Important note: I, personally, made no extra money for my efforts. My ordering had a financial reward, I just didn't see any of it.)
Those of us who care about these things have an innate understanding among one another. Go buy the High Fidelity movie. In the scene where Todd Luiso is trying to figure out how John Cusack is ordering his record collection, when Cusack says "Autobiographical" and Luiso says "No fucking way", if you laugh knowingly, then you're One Of Us, and nothing I've said so far will sound strange to you.
One Of Us means you have a very specific way of ordering these things, even if it's completely different from mine. The differences of details may be different, but broadly speaking, we're on the same page. Look, what you do in the privacy of your own home is fine. Store them by barcode, or even by production designer, if you like (but never by Golden Globe nomination). Despite the desire I'll have to reorder your shelf when I'm visiting you, I'm truly fine with whichever way you choose to store you own product. However, keep it in your home.
DO NOT take your twisted, unnatural, and possibly heretic ordering system out of your house and into whichever store you're minimume-waging at! We live in a society, people, and as such, we need our shelves to make sense! Categorisation in retail outlets is abysmal, as per these examples:
- A popular music store I frequent likes to mark the delineation between Popular and Alternative, but Alternative isn't a real genre. It's a made-up retailer genre. When Alternative music starts selling really well, it suddenly becomes Popular (as evidenced with a sticker I saw on the Alternative section for The Streets, which read "Also Popular", a statement I take issue with for many different reasons). Having a working knowledge of genres is good. An assumed knowledge of charts and sales figures is not. I'm not saying lump it all in together so that Mozart is next to Motorhead, but just be logical. Separating Country and Hip-Hop makes sense. Separating Radiohead and Coldplay because there's some accepted logic is that Radiohead is "edgier" is not.
- In a video store chain, I found Walkabout and Picnic At Hanging Rock in the Foreign section. Foreign, in this case, clearly meant "Arthouse", or perhaps "Fuck, my tiny brain really doesn't understand this film!". Technically, if you're going to have a Foreign section in a video store in Australia, every film that isn't Australian should go in there, which includes everything from America (yes, even Hollywood). If by "Foreign" you mean "Foreign Language", you should probably leave out Walkabout, Down By Law, and Secrets and Lies, which, last I checked, were all in English. If, however, you want them all lumped together and kept away from "normal" people hoping for a standard comedy or action film, call it all Arthouse. It's at least a step up from Foreign, even if it's mostly just as rubbish. Why rubbish? Because it's the same problem as Alternative, where you kind-of need a working knowledge of box office returns. Name me a film that should go in Arthouse instead of a more traditional genre (drama, comedy, etc) and I'll show you a mainstream snob who dismisses films that don't have "broad appeal". (Disclaimer: Jim Jarmusch and David Lynch don't count. They should have their own sections, so that the video store partitions read Drama, Action, Comedy, Romance, Jarmusch, Lynch, Kids.)
- Even bookstores, which are usually a bit better at this sort of thing, have a similar problem. Many make the distinction between Fiction and Literature, which is essentially the difference between Good and Bad. Is Nick Hornby fiction or literature? It actually depends upon which store you're in. They're wearing their snobbishness on their sleeves when they split books up into these categories. At least if they'd call one of the sections Airport Rubbish, I'd be impressed by their honesty.
- Hell, even my favourite bookstore in the world (Fuller's in Hobart) did something I found ridiculous: they don't have a Science Fiction/Fantasy section. Now, that didn't bother me too much as I don't read a lot of it, and the lack of the section would be fine if they didn't stock any SF/Fantasy books... but they did. Where were they? Under the heading of Speculative Fiction. Clearly, the store is too high brow to admit to having science fiction or fantasy in their collection, and have hidden it under a redundant title designed mostly to obfuscate. Why redundant? Well, isn't all fiction, at heart, speculation? Isn't the term "speculative fiction" an oxymoron?
Somehow, I feel that if I were to address any of these points to the people who categorised them (particularly the video and music partitioners), I'd be met with a dismissive "Oh, but everyone gets what we mean", which is a particularly favourite phrase of mine, usually evoked when the user can't bring themselves to be clear in the first place. Are not these categories designed to help us find what we want? Are they not supposed to make our lives simpler? Why then can I not find Chuck Palaniuk books in Fiction, or The White Stripes in Popular, or My Brilliant Career in Drama?
Or am I the only one who cares about things like this? If so, I shall give up my battle, and, out of spite, see if I can this rant categorised as a Technical Manual.
My DVDs are, naturally, in alphabetical order. My books are arranged alphabetically by author surname, then within that, chronological by book. Similarly, CDs are alphabetical by band/artist, and within that, the albums are chronological. Importantly, solo artists are alphabetical by surname, whilst bands are alphabetical by the first word. This is an important rules, because Paul Simon solo albums go under "S", but Jethro Tull albums go under "J", because it's the name of the band and therefore a singular entity with no such thing as a surname. Really, it's just common sense.
My friends have similar systems. Some of them alphabetise by director. Being a film geek, I really like this system, but there are problems. It does mean splitting up certain series. Harry Potter would be five different places. The Star Trek films would be all over the place, which, I must admit, is somewhat fitting given the Star Trek films are all over the place. As much as I appreciate it, I must admit I think it an imperfect system. And yes, my friends and I have discussed this at length.
I'm sure some of you are laughing scornfully now (also known as lolscorn), because you believe all of this is useless and has no practical value. You would be wrong.
Many years back, I began working at a video store -- Reel Time Video, to be precise, now defunct -- and with few customers, I had very little to do on my first night. It was also quite apparent to me that nobody else in the store really knew anything about movies. There was a lovely (and sassy) elderly lady who used to own the store, the Chinese woman with little-to-no English who had bought it from her, and the manager, a middle-aged woman who wasn't a huge film buff but still had enough basic knowledge to get by. Most of the sections were in a complete mess, so, on my first night, I stood in front of the science fiction section (comprised mostly of Star Trek videos) and placed them in alphabetical order, and the many Star Trek videos in chronological order. When I was done, that thoroughly unattractive mess had transformed into a pretty decent-looking collection of SF film and television. That night, the usually-ignored SF shelf had at least three people in front of it at any given time, and twelve Star Trek videos were hired out (before then, none had been hired in weeks). Over the next few shifts, I did the same to the other sections, with similar successes. Don't tell me an anal-retentive adherence to shelf order doesn't have any value! (Important note: I, personally, made no extra money for my efforts. My ordering had a financial reward, I just didn't see any of it.)
Those of us who care about these things have an innate understanding among one another. Go buy the High Fidelity movie. In the scene where Todd Luiso is trying to figure out how John Cusack is ordering his record collection, when Cusack says "Autobiographical" and Luiso says "No fucking way", if you laugh knowingly, then you're One Of Us, and nothing I've said so far will sound strange to you.
One Of Us means you have a very specific way of ordering these things, even if it's completely different from mine. The differences of details may be different, but broadly speaking, we're on the same page. Look, what you do in the privacy of your own home is fine. Store them by barcode, or even by production designer, if you like (but never by Golden Globe nomination). Despite the desire I'll have to reorder your shelf when I'm visiting you, I'm truly fine with whichever way you choose to store you own product. However, keep it in your home.
DO NOT take your twisted, unnatural, and possibly heretic ordering system out of your house and into whichever store you're minimume-waging at! We live in a society, people, and as such, we need our shelves to make sense! Categorisation in retail outlets is abysmal, as per these examples:
- A popular music store I frequent likes to mark the delineation between Popular and Alternative, but Alternative isn't a real genre. It's a made-up retailer genre. When Alternative music starts selling really well, it suddenly becomes Popular (as evidenced with a sticker I saw on the Alternative section for The Streets, which read "Also Popular", a statement I take issue with for many different reasons). Having a working knowledge of genres is good. An assumed knowledge of charts and sales figures is not. I'm not saying lump it all in together so that Mozart is next to Motorhead, but just be logical. Separating Country and Hip-Hop makes sense. Separating Radiohead and Coldplay because there's some accepted logic is that Radiohead is "edgier" is not.
- In a video store chain, I found Walkabout and Picnic At Hanging Rock in the Foreign section. Foreign, in this case, clearly meant "Arthouse", or perhaps "Fuck, my tiny brain really doesn't understand this film!". Technically, if you're going to have a Foreign section in a video store in Australia, every film that isn't Australian should go in there, which includes everything from America (yes, even Hollywood). If by "Foreign" you mean "Foreign Language", you should probably leave out Walkabout, Down By Law, and Secrets and Lies, which, last I checked, were all in English. If, however, you want them all lumped together and kept away from "normal" people hoping for a standard comedy or action film, call it all Arthouse. It's at least a step up from Foreign, even if it's mostly just as rubbish. Why rubbish? Because it's the same problem as Alternative, where you kind-of need a working knowledge of box office returns. Name me a film that should go in Arthouse instead of a more traditional genre (drama, comedy, etc) and I'll show you a mainstream snob who dismisses films that don't have "broad appeal". (Disclaimer: Jim Jarmusch and David Lynch don't count. They should have their own sections, so that the video store partitions read Drama, Action, Comedy, Romance, Jarmusch, Lynch, Kids.)
- Even bookstores, which are usually a bit better at this sort of thing, have a similar problem. Many make the distinction between Fiction and Literature, which is essentially the difference between Good and Bad. Is Nick Hornby fiction or literature? It actually depends upon which store you're in. They're wearing their snobbishness on their sleeves when they split books up into these categories. At least if they'd call one of the sections Airport Rubbish, I'd be impressed by their honesty.
- Hell, even my favourite bookstore in the world (Fuller's in Hobart) did something I found ridiculous: they don't have a Science Fiction/Fantasy section. Now, that didn't bother me too much as I don't read a lot of it, and the lack of the section would be fine if they didn't stock any SF/Fantasy books... but they did. Where were they? Under the heading of Speculative Fiction. Clearly, the store is too high brow to admit to having science fiction or fantasy in their collection, and have hidden it under a redundant title designed mostly to obfuscate. Why redundant? Well, isn't all fiction, at heart, speculation? Isn't the term "speculative fiction" an oxymoron?
Somehow, I feel that if I were to address any of these points to the people who categorised them (particularly the video and music partitioners), I'd be met with a dismissive "Oh, but everyone gets what we mean", which is a particularly favourite phrase of mine, usually evoked when the user can't bring themselves to be clear in the first place. Are not these categories designed to help us find what we want? Are they not supposed to make our lives simpler? Why then can I not find Chuck Palaniuk books in Fiction, or The White Stripes in Popular, or My Brilliant Career in Drama?
Or am I the only one who cares about things like this? If so, I shall give up my battle, and, out of spite, see if I can this rant categorised as a Technical Manual.
| 83 |
| Vote |
Shared on
Subscribe to this blog
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
I am one of those people who begins with a huge clean up; standing reference books together, dictionaries, thesaurus, foreign language dictionaries etc etc, pens, pads, and so on.
However, as I begin to work, things just get messy again, and I am always too tired to fix it up after writing for hours, then can't be bothered to fix it before I start the next day, till...eventually...I get pissed off with not being able to find anything...
so, when are you available...daily?
cheers, fun post!
fog
Comment by Harry
World Art
Sydney Diary
Personals
Video Games
Brisbane Diarystar
Zoo Parent